SKRIPSI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS : THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN BUILDING SENTENCES AND THEIR WRITING ABILITY AT THE TENTH CLASS
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The
Background of the
Problem
English
language is an important part of the world, because by using a language we can
communicate and express our ideas. We need language not only for communication
but also for getting science and technology. Many occupations need someone who
has mastered English skills well. English has four skills; they are speaking,
listening, reading, and writing. All of the skills are highly required.
In
Indonesia, English as foreign language. Because of that, English becomes a
difficult study to be learnt. People think that they do not need English to
communicate in their daily activities because they can use their own language.
For students, they only get a few times to learn or practice English
in school. So, they are not interested and always be shy to use English.
Writing is one of English
skills that should be mastered by the students beside listening, speaking, and
reading. But, the students still have difficulties in writing because they
confused and they are not to be brave to express their idea. They do not have enough vocabulary
and they are afraid to make something wrong with the grammar, too. Therefore
they think that writing is boring activity and it is
uninteresting for them.
Referring
the condition above, the writer
believes that writing is a skill that needs extra works to be mastered. The purpose
of teaching writing is to improve the students ability to be brave to express
their idea, especially in writing context. Writing, for obvious reasons, is one of the most visible products of
education, and incorect usage and spelling havew been taken to be signs or a
personal scholastic failure and an alleged widespread deterioration of writing
ability and indication of inadequacies in whole scholl systems.
Writing is an
effective way to communicate and express our thoughts, feelings, and opinions
to others. Writing has function to entertaining and making fun. There are a
variety of ways to use writing in our everyday live. For example we can write about the cake receipt. Writing skill
helps the learners gain independent, comprehensibility, fluency and creativity
in writing. If learners have mastered these skills, they will be able to write
so that not only they can read what they have written, but others speakers of
that language can read and understand it.
In general, the students still have difficulties in
writing. The students have difficulty to express their idea, opinions, thought
and feeling. There are so many students want to write an English which can be
easily to be read and understood by their friends, but they usually afraid of
making mistakes especially in building sentences. Through building sentences in
the school, it will improve students’ grammar in writing English.
In writing students usually make many mistakes, especially for young
learners, even in grammatical and also its content. Most of the mistakes they
have made are often found in writing activities such as, building sentences
from words into sentences and arranging sentences to be a good paragraph. If they can
not master building sentences ability, it can be hard for them to master
writing. Because building sentences is a part and a process of writing. It can
help the students to write well.
As a teacher,
teaching is not an easy job but it is necessary one and can be very rewarding
when we see out students’ progress and know that we have helped to make it
happen. Many
teachers are also strongly committed to invite students to participate
effectively in writing situations. The teachers have some texts for help them
in teaching writing. The texts are purposeful and patterned to serve writer
purpose. Each texts type has different social function, general structure, and
language feature. There are many kinds of text that are studied in junior high school students, namely narrative, descriptive,
recount, report, and procedure.
Based on the preliminary research the writer found that the students
have many problems in writing, one of them is building sentence. They often make
errors when they build the sentence. Beside that, the writer found that
students’ writing ability still needed improvement, especially in building sentences. Finally, Based on the background of the problem above, the
writer conducted a research with the title “The
Correlation Between Students’ Ability in Building
Sentences and Their Writing Ability of the Tenth Class at Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah
Bandar Lampung in 2015/2016”
1.2 The
Identifacation of the Problem
Based
on the background above, the identification of the problem as follows:
1. The students find difficulties in
building sentences which had correct grammar pattern
2. The students’ writing ability should be increased
1.3 The
limitation of the Problem
Based on the identification of problem
above the writer would like to focus on “The Correlation between Students’ Ability In Building Sentences and Their
Writing Ability of the Tenth Class at Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung
in 2015/2016”.
1.4
The Formulation of the Problem
The
formulation of problem of this research are as follow:
1. How is the correlation between
students’ ability in building sentences and their writing ability?
1.5
The Objective of Research
Based on the previous explanation, the
objectives of this reaserch are :
1. To know the correlation between
students’ ability in building sentences and their writing ability.
1.6
The Uses of Research
1.
To
give information about the correlation between students’ ability in building sentences and their ability in
writing
2.
To
give information for the teacher about the importance of building sentences in
writing
3.
To
give information for students about the importance of building sentences in
writing
1.7
The Scope of Research
The scope of this reseach are:
1.7.1
The Subject of the Research
The research subject is the students of the tenth class at Madrasah
Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung in 2015/2016
1.7.2
The Object of the Research
The object of the research is building sentences and writing
ability
1.7.3
The Place of the Research
The research was conducted of the tenth class at Madrasah
Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung.
1.7.4.
The Time of the Research
The research was conducted at the tenth class of the first
semester of Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung in 2015/2016.
CHAPTER II
THE FRAME OF
THEORIES, THINKING, AND HYPHOTESIS
2.1
The Frame of Theories
In this part the writer explains the
concept of language, the concept of teaching and learning English as a foreign
language, the concept of grammar, the concept of writing and the concept of
building sentences.
2.2
The Concept of Language
Language is very important for
communication with each other people in the world. People use language in their
daily activities and as a tool of communication among the numbers of people. It
supported by (Larsen-Freeman,2003:2) states, “Language is a means of interaction
between and among people.” It means that without language we can not
communication or interaction well with each other people.
Language
also has fuctions to communicate general attitudes toward life and other, and
to express their idea, inspirations and knowledge about culture of the other
country. In addition, language is used in every aspect in daily life, therefore
people can get information easier and can get
everything by using language. Without language we cannot communicate
between each other in our life because language way make something easier for
their speaker to say other things. This
statement is
supported by Jack C. Richard (2001:180) who states that “Language is viewed as vehicle for
communicating meaning and massage”.
Language is a medium of communication
which is able to connect among people with their different background. Brown
(1994:37) states that “language is a way of life, that is a way of life, that
is the foundation of us to communicate and to interact simultaneuously with thoughts
and feelings.” It means that language plays an important role in the world it
is considered as means of communication. People use language to communicate and
interact with others to fulfill their needs.
Based on the statement above, the
writer assumes that language is an important tool to communicate, without
language people would not be able to communicate between each other. Language is also a tool unifier between
people with each other
2.3
Concept
of Teaching English as A Foreign
Language
As
we know English in Indonesia as a foreign language. The functions as a
tool of communication with a foreign
people from other countries. Because of that, people think that they do not
need English to communicate in their daily activities because they can use their
own language. For the students sometimes they should study hard to learn
English, because English as a foreign language is to create the situation that
the students can use English as a means of communication. It supported by
Harmer (2004;39) said that “English as a foreign language is generally taken to
apply the student who are studying general English at school and institutes in
their own country or as transitory visitors in target language a country”.
“In
teaching foreign language there is an onus on the teacher to provide exposure
to the language and to provide opportunities for learning through classroom
activities”(Cameron, 2001:12). It means that the teacher must be able to convey the material with as simple as possible
so that students can easily receive the material provided.
“English
as a foreign language is generally taken to apply the student who are studying
general English at school and institutes in their own country or as transitory
visitors in target language a country “ (Harmer, 2004:39). It means that the
student should be put into situation that they use English for communication
both spoken and written in their own country or other countries.
Brown
(1994:49) states that “In language teaching we must practice and practice, again and again. Just watch a small
child learning his mother tongue they repeat thing over again during the
language stage. We practice all the time. This we must also do when we learn a
fogeign language”. It means
that when we
have to learn a
lot of exercise so that we can use it well,
especially in foreign
language learning.
Based
on the statement above, the writer assumes that language as
a foreign language is important for
students or anyone, because English is the
language of the world that has a function as
a communication tool both in
our own country or
in other countries. and teachers
should also be able to convey the material well and can be received by students.
is the first
language in the whole
world.
2.4
The
Concept of Grammar
Grammar
is a system of language. People sometimes describe grammar as the “rules” of
the language. Actually the word grammar has several meanings anddescriptions
attemped by linguists.
According to Larsen-Freeman“Grammar
is one of dynamic linguistic process of pattern formation in language, which
can be used by humans for making meaning in context appropriate ways”.
Larsen-Freeman (2003:142). It means that grammar
is proper and necessary processes to be part of the linguistics
Grammar is an important
thing that must
be mastered by people/student because by mastering grammar the students will
be able to speak English or write sentences correctly. Harmer said that
“grammar is essential for component users of language” (Harmer,1991:32)
Grammar
is the students’ part of study in what forms are possible in language.
Traditionally, grammar has been concerned almost exclusively with analysis at
the level of sentences. So, in this case grammar learns about the description
of the rules that govern how a language sentences are formed. (Thornburry,
Scott, 2006:12).
Brown said that, “Grammar is a system of
rules governing the convenional arrangement and relationship of word in
sentences”. (Brown, 1994). It means that grammar is an important rules is needed in making
sentences from the word to be a sentences
According
to Scoot Thornbury (2005:1) “that grammar is a description of the rules that
goven how a language sentences are formed or partly the study of what forms (or
structure) are possible in a language”. It means that grammar is an important part of
language as structure.
Thornburry
(1991:1) say thay,”Grammar is descriptions of the rules that govern sentences
are formed, grammar attempts to explain why the following sentences are
acceptable.” It means that grammar is
a rule that
governs the sentence to be
understood and accepted.
Grammar
tell us about how to construct a sentence well. By mastering grammar ,
students will know how to arrange a
phrase, a clause in sentence, and it is very important in communication between
orally or written. If what we say is grammatically correct, other people will
understand what we have said easily. This statement is supported by Larsen-Freeman
“Grammar is about word order in sentences (syntax) and word formation processes
(morphology), it is also about using the correct function words. Importantly,
grammar plays a role in the construction and interpretation of texts
(Larsen-Freeman, 2003:18).
Based
on the statement above, the writer assumes that grammar is the important thing
of language and in building sentences as structure. By mastering grammar
someone will know how to arrenge a phrase, a clause, in a sentence.
2.5
The
Concept of Writing
Writing
is one of the four language skills. Beside listening, speaking and reading with
writing the students will be encouraged to express their ideas, though and
feeling. Writing is the most difficult skills in English. So the students
should be serious in learning writing.
Harmer
(2004:4) state “because writing is used for a wide variety of purpose it is
produced in many different forms”. It means that the
writing was made has a goal and have
a variety of forms.
It
is also supported by Brown (1994:321) states that “to make a good writing a
writer has to master the component of language, they are spelling, vocabulary,
punctuation and grammar”. It mean that to learn writing the student must
understand and master about the component of language. Because, writing is a
process to express ideas or feeling that used the component of language.
Futhermore,
According to Brown (2001:137) “Writing is, in fact, a transaction with word
whereby you free yourself from what you presently think, feel, and perceive”.
It means that writing is a tool to express your feelings of
what you feel, what you see that you cannot be said.
Brown (2001:343) also states that there
are some indicators for writing ability, those are:
1.
Produce graphemes and orthographic patterns
of English
2.
Produce writing at an efficient rate of speed
to suit the purpose
3.
Produce an acceptable core of words and use
appropriate word order patterns
4.
Use acceptable grammatical systems (e.g.,
tense, agreement, pluralization, patterns, and rules)
5.
Express a particular meaning in different
grammatical forms
6.
Use cohesive devices in written discourse
7.
Use the rhetorical forms and conventions of
written discourse
8.
Appropriately accomplish the communicative
functions of written text according to form and purpose
9.
Convey links and connections between events
and communicate such relations as main idea, supporting idea, new information,
given information, generalization, and exemplification
10. Distinguish
between literal and implied meanings when writing
11. Correctly
convey culturally specific references in the context of the written text
12. Develop and
use a battery of writting strategies, such as accurately assessing the
audience’s interpretation, using prewriting devices, writing with fluency in
the first draft, using paraphrases and synonyms, soliciting peer aqnd
instructor feedback, and using feedback for revising and editing
Based
on the statement above, the writer assumes that the students must can mastered
writing because writing is one of important part in language. And from writing
student can express an ideas or feeling.
2.6
The
Concept of Building Sentences
To
master language the students should be able to master language skill, one of
them is writing skill. It of course,
needs the students ability of combine the words into appropriate
sentence. That is the ability of building sentences. Building sentences is an
activity where the words combined became a sentence. It supported by Manser
(2011:146) “Build is construct something by putting parts or material
together”. It means that building sentences is an activity to combined or
construct words became a sentence. Building sentences studied in syntax.
Mohammad Adnan Latief. Ph. D (1995:1) states that “Syntax refers to the system
of setting words to construct a meaningful expression in the form of phrases
and sentences”.
Manser
(20011) states that “Sentence is a group of words that express a statement,
questions, etc”. (Manser,2011). It means that the sentence is a collection of
some of the words that have meaning.
"Sentence is a group
of words that
makes complete sense".
(Peter-Knapp and
Megan-Wtkins, 2005:
63). It means
that the sentence is a group of words that have
a meaning that can be understood.
Sentence are categorized into four
types; simple, complete, complex and a compound complex sentence. A simple
sentence contains only a single clause, while a compound sentence and compound
complex sentence contain at least two clauses.
Rationale:
OH-
Ohio Academic Content Standards
Subject : English Language
Arts
Standard : Writing Conventions
Area : Grammar and Usage
Grade
Level Indicator : Use
nouns, verbs and adjectives (descriptive words)
Area :
Punctuation and
Capitalization
Grade
Level Indicator : Use end
punctuation correctly, including question marks, exclamation points
and periods.
Grade
Level Indicator : Use correct
capitalization (e.g., the first word in a sentence, names and the pronoun I).
https://otterbein.digication.com/erika_peart_educ_2600_portfolio/Lesson_Plans/published/?sh_6151335=6&moduleinstid=6151335&page_mode=published
Based on statement above, the writer
assumes that building sentences is an activity to combined and construct words
become a sentences that have meaning that can be understood.
2.7
The Correlation Between Students’
Ability in Building Sentences and Their Writing Ability
There
are four skills of language; listening, reading, speaking and writing. In this
case, the writer just focus on writing because writing as one of as language
skill has relation with some aspects. The student should have ability write
well, especially structure because how they can write well if they do not know
the structure well. It is supported by Nunan who said that “Succesfull writing
then involves mastering the mechanics of latter formation and mastering and
obeying convention of spelling and punctuation, using the grammatical system to
convey one the students’ intended meaning. (Nunan, 1989:37).
It
is also supported by Thornburry (2005:1) who stated that “Grammar is a
description of the rules that govern how language’s sentence are forms (or
structure) are possible in a language”. It means that the sructure of the language is
very important in order that the student will be able to construct and
correlate word by word to be a new sentence. So, by mastering structure
students can make sentences correctly and easily.
Writing
is made up of sentences. It constitutes to be the combination of simple
sentence, compound sentence, complex sentence and even compound complex
sentence. To produce a good writing, the writer should take into account the
balance of the use of the four types of sentences.
Harmer
(2004:33) said that “Writing is frequently useful as preparation for some other
activity, in particular when students write sentences as a preamble to
discussion activities”. It is mean that students can go through what theiy know
in their minds and the students can use dictionaries, grammar book or other
references material to help them. So they can develop their writing, not only
can write a sentence but also write paragraph, story or longer composition.
Based on the statement above, the
writer assumes if students can not building a sentence or construct sentences
properly so they can not write well. because building sentences can affect
their writing ability.
2.8
Frame
of Thinking
Building sentences is an activity to
make the words became a sentence. Building sentences is one of the important
thing in learning English process. Learning English has four skills. One of
them is writing. In building sentence writing is very needed to make a good
sentence.

![]()


![]()
2.9
The Hypothesis
Based
on the theories, definition and statement above the writer formulated the
hypothesis as follows:
1. There is correlation between students’
ability in building sentences and their writing ability
2. There
is a positive correlation between students’ ability in building sentences with
their writing ability
3. There
is a significant correlation between students’ ability in building sentences
with their writing ability
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
3.1
The Method of Research
In
this research, the writer used
descriptive quantitative method. Because the writer chooses the research about
the correlation between students’ building sentences and their writing ability,
which is analyzing data based on numbering form. To get the data, the writer
used item test.
3.2
The Variable of the Research
There
are two variables in this research, namely:
1. The independent variable is the
students’ building sentences (X)
2. The dependent variable is the students’
writing ability (Y)
3.2.1
The Operational Definition of Variable
The
operational definition of variable is to describe the variable that
investigated by the writer. The operational of variables are as follow:
1. The students’ ability in building
sentences . It is the ability of the students to make sentences. It is
indicated by the scores achieved from the test given.
2. The students’ writing ability. It is the ability in expressing ideas,
thought and feeling in writing form. It is indicated by the scores achieved
from the test given.
3.3
Population, Sample
and Sampling Technique
3.3.1
The Population
The
population of this research was the first semester of the tenth class of
Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung as the population. The total
population of this research is 120 students in three classes.
Table
1
The
population of students based on class and gender of the tenth class
at MA
Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung
|
Number |
Class |
Gender |
Total
of students |
|
|
Male |
Female |
|||
|
1 |
X.A |
9 |
31 |
40 |
|
2 |
X.B |
18 |
22 |
40 |
|
3 |
X.C |
16 |
24 |
40 |
|
Total |
|
43 |
77 |
120 |
Source : MA Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung
2014/2015
3.3.2
The Sample
Suharsimi Arikunto states, “jika populasi kurang dari 100 maka dapat
diambil semua sebagai sampel. Ini dinamakan penelitian populasi. Tetapi bila
populasi lebih dari atau sama dengan 100, maka sebagai sampel dapat diambil 10-15%
atau lebih dari populasi”.
Because the population is more than 100,
then the writer took 33% of the population that was the object of research.
That is: 120 x 33 : 100= 40 students. The
writer took 40 students as the sample.
3.3.3
The Sampling Technique
To
get the sample of the research, the writer used Stratified Proportionate Random
Sampling Technique because the population is heterogeneous. In this case, the writer devide
population into three levels they are high, middle, and low. Based on the
population the writer took sample that also in range high, middle, and low as
follow :
High =
x 25 = 8.25 = 8
Middle
=
x 60 = 19.8 = 20
Low =
x 35 = 11.5 = 12
The
writer took 8 students from 25 students, 20 students from 60 students, and 12
students from 35 students. In the taking the sample, the writer used lottary,
totally the writer took 40 students as the sample of the research.
3.4
The Data Collecting Technique
3.4.1
The Main Technique
To
collect the data, the writer used
test with the details:
·
To
know the students’ ability in building sentences, the writer used the essay
test. The test consisted of 20 words where the students made the sentences
based on the words given and the score of each item is 5, so the highest score
is 100.
·
To
know the students’ writing ability, the writer used the wriring test where the students
write a composition. In this case, the writer gave 3 topics only, and then the
writer asked the students to choose on of those topics. The topics as follow :
1. My Ambition
2. My Home Town
3. My Childhood
In scoring students writing, the writer
used assesment scale for written work by Heaton as follows:
Content
:
30-27 : Excellent to very good knowledgeeable-substantive,
substantive Development of thesis,relevant to assigment topic
26-22 : Good to
average: sure knowledge of subject; adequate range,limited
Development of thesis; mostly relevsnt to topic but lacks
detail
21-17 : Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject,
litlle substance, inadequate development of topic
16-13 : Very poor: does not show knowledge of
subject; non substantive, not pertinent; or not enough to evaluate
Organization
20-18 : Excellent to very good: fluently expression;
ideas clearly stated/
Supported; succinct; well-organized; logical sequencing;
cohesive
17-14 : Good to average: somewhat choppy; loosely
organized but main idea stand out; limited support; logical but incomplite
sequencing
13-10 : Fair to good: non-fluent; idea confuse or
unconnected; lack logical sequencing and development
9-1 : Very poor: does not communicate; no
organization; or not enough to evaluate
Vocabulary
20-18 : Excellent to very good: sophisticated range;
effective word/idiom and usage; word form mastery; appropriate register
17-14 : Good to average: adequate range; occasional
error of word/idiom from, choice,usage but meaning not obscured
13-10 : Fair to good: limited rangen;frequent error
of word/idiom from, choice usage; meaning confused or obscured
9-7 : Very poor: essentially translation; little
knowladge of English vocabulary,idioms,word form; or not enough to evaluate
Language
Use
25-22 : Excellent to very good:
effective,complex,construction; few errors of greement, tense, number, word, order/
function, articles, pronouns, preposition
21-18 : Good to average: effective but simple
construction;minor problems in constructions;several errors of agreement, tense,
number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, preposition, but meaning
seldom obscured
17-11 : Fair to poor: major problems in simple/
complex construction; frequent errors
of negation, agreement, tense
10-5 : Very poor: virtually no master of sentence
construction rules; dominated by errors; does not communicate; or not enough to
evaluate
Mechanics
5 : Excellent to very good: demonstrate mastery
of convention; few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization,
paragraphing
4 : Good to average: occasion
3.4.2
The Supporting Technique
1. Documentation
The
writer uses this technique to get the information about students’ English score
and the total number of population from the school.
2. Observation
The
writer uses this technique to get the information about the condition or
teaching learning process of the students by observing to the class.
3.5
The Validity,
Reliability, and
Readability of The Test
3.5.1
The Validity of the Test
To get the data, the writer gave the
test to the students. To know the validity of test the writer used construct
validity. It means that the test is based on current curriculum of MA Al-Hikmah
Bandar Lampung
3.5.2
The Reliability of Test
To know the reliability of the test, the writer
tries the test item by using Alpha Formula, as follows :
1. Analyze
the result by using, as follow :
![]()
Notes
:
: Reliability
k : the
number of items
: the total of variance
∑
:
total variance of all items
(Arikunto,2006:109)
2. To
find the variance of the writer use the formula as follow:
Notes:
= The variace
∑
= The number of data quadrate
(∑
) =
The number of data being quadrate
N =
The number of data
Then the result of
will be consulted to the criteria
of reliability as follow:
1. Reliability coefficient 0.800 – 1.00 is very high
2. Reliability coefficient 0.600 – 0.800 is high
3. Reliability coefficient 0.400 – 0.600 is fair
4. Reliability coefficient 0.200 – 0.400 is low
5. Reliability coefficient 0.00 – 0.200 is very low
(Arikunto,2006:109)
3.5.3
The Result of
Students’ Building Sentences Try Out
![]()
=
=
=
= ![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
= ![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
1
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
=
=
=
=
![]()
The Total of varians of the questionier
∑
=
+
+
+
+
+ …………………………
∑
= 0.96 + 0.36 + 0.61 + 0.25 +
0.49 + 0.61 + 1.05 + 0.21 + 1.16 + 3.01 +
1.21 + 0.36 + 1 + 0.6 + 1.05 + 1.41 + 0.64 + 0.84
+2.49 + 0.89
∑
= 19.2
The total of the varians is:
![]()
= ![]()
=![]()
=![]()
= ![]()
= 79.64
From the calculation above it can be included to alpha formula as
follows:
![]()
= ![]()
=![]()
= (1.052) (1 – 0.24)
= (1.052) (0.76)
= 0.79
Based on the reliability by Suharsimi Arikunto’s criteria that the item
of building sentences test that the result is around 0.600 – 0.800. the writer
got
hit = 0.79. so it means that the
test items is high reliability.
3.5.4
The Readability
of Test
In administering a
test, it is important to set and determine an understandable instruction. It is
necessary since there have been some cases in which students failed to do the
test due to their inability to understand the given instruction. Hughes
(1989:39-40) mentions some factors to write a good instruction. First, the
instruction should be clear and explicit. Second, it should avoid the
supposition that students all know what is intended. Third, the test writer
should not really on the students’ power the telephaty to explicit the desired
behavior.
3.5.4.1
Readability of Writing Test
3.5.4.2
Readability of Writing Test Contains:
a. Whether the instruction are understandable or not
b. Wheter the kind of test is clear or not
c.
Wheter the
organization of the (generic structure) of the essay is understandable or not
d. Wheter writing indicators to be evaluated are clear or
not
e. Wheter the topics are interesting or not
3.5.4.3
Readability of Test Items:
a. Do you understand the instruction of the test?
b. Is the kind of the essay to be written in this test
stated clearly?
c.
Is the organization
of the test essay demanded in this test understandable?
d. Are the writing indicators to be evaluated in this
test clear?
e. Are topics interesting?
To know wheter the
test was readable or not, the try out is given to other studentsout of the
samples having the same level as the samples.
Table 3
The result of Readability Test
|
Question |
Yes |
No |
Result |
|
1 |
35 |
5 |
88% |
|
2 |
33 |
7 |
83% |
|
3 |
32 |
8 |
80% |
|
4 |
37 |
3 |
93% |
|
5 |
36 |
4 |
90% |
The result is more
than 75% of respondents give “YES” answer to each item or readability test. It
can be concluded that the item of writing test is readable.
3.6
The Data Analysis
3.6.1
The Normality of Test
To
know wheter the data comes from the population that has normal distribution,
the writer used Chi Square (x²) formula, as follow:
1. Searching the average X (X) and
standard deviation (S), as follows :
S²=
2. Determining trhe expected frequency
(Ei) and perception frequency (Oi, as follows :
a)
Delimitating
the boundary of the class (X) by using subtraction the lowest score in the
class by 0.5
b) Calculating Z for the boundary of the
class with the formula Z =.....
c) Calculating with of internatinal class
by seeing Z value list
d) Calculating expected frequency (Ei) by
multiplying wide of every interval with the total of the data that is : Ei = L1.N
e) Then, after got the calculating,
determining x² ratio by using formula:
² ratio = ![]()
With
the criterion test: reject
if:
²ratio
≥
²(1-α)(k-3)
3.6.2
The Hypotheses of Test
To
know the correlation between students’ ability in building sentences and their
writing ability (X-Y), the writer used the
product moment formula, as follow :
![]()
Note
n : the total number of sample
x : the total number of odd items
y : the total number of events items
x² : the square of x
y² : the square of y
xy : the total number of x times by y
rxy : the coeficient correlation between x (odd
items) and y (even items)
The results are:
1. rcount<
rtab = it means that there is positive correlation between students’
ability in building sentences and their writing ability.
2. To
know the significant of the correlation between students’ ability in building
sentences and their writing ability, the writer would like to consult the
result of data analysis with the table of product moment.
CHAPTER
IV
THE
REPORT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 The
Procedure of Research
The research was conducted at the first semester of the tenth class of Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung
in 2015/2016. In conducting the
research, the writer asked permission to the headmaster of Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung also
the English teacher who teaches at the
second semester of the tenth
class. Furthermore, the writer conducted by doing the following procedures:
Determining the subject of
the research that was the students of the first
semester of the tenth
class of Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar
Lampung in 2015/2016
1.
Determining the research
sample by using stratified proportionate random sampling technique.
2.
Arranged the instrument
test.
3.
Gave the test items to
collect the data of students’ building
sentences and their
writing ability.
4.
Calculated the result of the
test to know the level of correlation between students’ building sentences and their writing ability.
5.
Made conclusion.
6.
Reported the result of the
research.
4.2 The Analysis and Hypothesis
Test
4.2.1 The Data of Research
To get the data, the writer had given
the test to the sample. In this case, the sample had done two kind of test. They were building sentences,
and their writing ability.
Furthemore, the writer showed the result of each test as follow:
4.2.1.1 The Data of Students’ Building
Sentences
Table
4
The
Score of Students’ Building Sentences
|
Number of Students |
Students’ Building
Sentences |
|
1 |
58 |
|
2 |
84 |
|
3 |
74 |
|
4 |
68 |
|
5 |
80 |
|
6 |
52 |
|
7 |
62 |
|
8 |
67 |
|
9 |
82 |
|
10 |
78 |
|
11 |
54 |
|
12 |
84 |
|
13 |
64 |
|
14 |
54 |
|
15 |
60 |
|
16 |
60 |
|
17 |
80 |
|
18 |
66 |
|
19 |
72 |
|
20 |
69 |
|
21 |
84 |
|
22 |
70 |
|
23 |
76 |
|
24 |
82 |
|
25 |
82 |
|
26 |
65 |
|
27 |
56 |
|
28 |
84 |
|
29 |
58 |
|
30 |
44 |
|
31 |
50 |
|
32 |
66 |
|
33 |
60 |
|
34 |
82 |
|
35 |
62 |
|
36 |
78 |
|
37 |
56 |
|
38 |
62 |
|
39 |
70 |
|
40 |
68 |
|
TOTAL |
2723 |
Source:
The Data Analysis
4.2.2
The
Data Normality Test of Building Sentences
From the result, it
is obtained that highest score is 84
and the lowest score is 44
from total students (n) = 40. From the data, the writer got :
Span (R) = highest
score – lowest score
= 84
- 44
= 40
Total number of
interval class (K) = 1 + 3.3 log n
= 1 + 3.3 log 40
= 1 + 3.3 (1.60)
= 1 + 5.28
= 6.28
= 6
Length of interval
class (P) = ![]()
= ![]()
=
6.6
=
7
Then the result above put into tables of
distributions frequency as follows :
Table 5
The invariant
frequency of building sentences
|
Score |
ƒ |
|
|
ƒ |
ƒ |
|
44 – 50 |
2 |
47 |
2209 |
94 |
4418 |
|
51 – 57 |
5 |
54 |
2916 |
270 |
14580 |
|
58 – 64 |
9 |
61 |
3721 |
549 |
33489 |
|
65 – 71 |
9 |
68 |
4624 |
612 |
4161 |
|
72 – 78 |
5 |
75 |
5625 |
375 |
28125 |
|
79 – 85 |
10 |
81.5 |
6642.25 |
815 |
66422.5 |
|
Total |
40 |
2715 |
188650.5 |
Source : The Data Analysis
From the table above it is obtained that
:
∑ ƒ
= 2715
∑ ƒ
2
= 188650.5
∑ ƒ
= 40
From the result above, so it would be
looked for average (
) and standard deviation (S) as
follows :
= ![]()
= ![]()
= 67.87
S2 = ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S = 10.58
The
next step is determining the expected frequency (Ei) and observed frequency
(Oi), as follows :
1. Delimitating the boundary of the
class (X) by using subtracting the lowest score in the class by 0.5
2. Calculating Z for the boundary of
the class with the formula Z = ![]()
3. Calculating the with of the interval
class by seeing Z value list
4.
Calculating
expected frequency (Ei) by multiplying the wide of every interval with the
total of every interval with the total of the data that is : Ei = Li
. n
Table 6
List of The Distribution of Expected
and Observed
Frequency of Building Sentences Test
|
X |
Z |
Zi |
Li |
Ei |
Oi |
|
43.5 50.5 57.5 64.5 71.5 78.5 85.5 |
-2.30 -1.64 -0.98 -0.32 0.34 1.00 1.57 |
0.4893 0.4495 0.3365 0.1255 0.1331 0.3413 0.4418 |
0.0398 0.113 0.211 0.2586 0.2082 0.1005 |
1.59 4.52 8.44 10.34 8.33 4.02 |
2 5 9 9 5 10 |
Source
: The Data Analysis
2ratio = ![]()
2ratio
= ![]()
2ratio =
0.11 + 0.05 + 0.04 + 0.17 + 1.33 + 8.89
2ratio =
10.59
Test
criterion :
Accept
Ho if
count <
2
(1 – α)(k – 3)
For
significant level of 1% (α = 0.01) got :
table =
2 (1-0.01)(6-3)
=
2 (0.99)(3)
= 11.3
From
calculation above, it was found at significance level of 0.01 that :
count <
table. So, the H0 hypothesis
is accepted, it means that the data have normal distribution.
4.3
The
Data Analysis and Normality Test of Writing
Ability
4.3.1 The Data Analysis of
Students’ Writing
Ability
Based on the result
of the students’ writing
ability test, writer got the data of students’ writing ability, as follow:
Table 7
The
Score of Students’ Writing Ability
|
Number of Students |
C |
O |
V |
L.U |
M |
Students’ Writing Ability |
|
1 |
17 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
3 |
60 |
|
2 |
23 |
16 |
20 |
19 |
4 |
82 |
|
3 |
22 |
16 |
19 |
19 |
4 |
80 |
|
4 |
21 |
14 |
16 |
19 |
3 |
73 |
|
5 |
24 |
15 |
20 |
19 |
4 |
82 |
|
6 |
18 |
14 |
16 |
15 |
3 |
66 |
|
7 |
19 |
15 |
16 |
15 |
3 |
68 |
|
8 |
18 |
15 |
17 |
15 |
3 |
68 |
|
9 |
24 |
16 |
20 |
19 |
4 |
83 |
|
10 |
22 |
16 |
17 |
20 |
3 |
78 |
|
11 |
18 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
3 |
66 |
|
12 |
21 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
3 |
74 |
|
13 |
18 |
13 |
16 |
14 |
3 |
64 |
|
14 |
19 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
3 |
67 |
|
15 |
17 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
3 |
60 |
|
16 |
19 |
13 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
64 |
|
17 |
23 |
16 |
20 |
19 |
4 |
82 |
|
18 |
17 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
3 |
60 |
|
19 |
19 |
14 |
15 |
19 |
3 |
70 |
|
20 |
22 |
15 |
17 |
19 |
3 |
76 |
|
21 |
24 |
16 |
20 |
19 |
4 |
83 |
|
22 |
20 |
13 |
16 |
18 |
3 |
70 |
|
23 |
17 |
12 |
15 |
12 |
3 |
59 |
|
24 |
22 |
16 |
17 |
20 |
3 |
78 |
|
25 |
23 |
16 |
20 |
19 |
4 |
82 |
|
26 |
22 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
3 |
75 |
|
27 |
21 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
3 |
74 |
|
28 |
22 |
15 |
18 |
20 |
3 |
78 |
|
29 |
22 |
15 |
17 |
20 |
3 |
77 |
|
30 |
17 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
3 |
64 |
|
31 |
18 |
12 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
62 |
|
32 |
19 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
3 |
70 |
|
33 |
19 |
13 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
64 |
|
34 |
22 |
15 |
17 |
19 |
3 |
76 |
|
35 |
0 |
14 |
16 |
19 |
3 |
72 |
|
36 |
20 |
14 |
16 |
19 |
3 |
72 |
|
37 |
19 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
3 |
70 |
|
38 |
17 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
3 |
58 |
|
39 |
20 |
13 |
16 |
18 |
3 |
70 |
|
40 |
20 |
14 |
16 |
19 |
3 |
72 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
2849 |
Source: The
Data Analysis
4.3.2
The
Data Normality Test of Writing
Ability
From the result, it
is obtained that highest score is 83
and the lowest score is 58
from total students (n) = 40. From the data, the writer got :
Span (R) = highest
score – lowest score
= 83
– 58
= 25
Total number of
interval class (K) = 1 + 3.3 log n
= 1 + 3.3 log 40
= 1 + 3.3 (1.60)
= 1 + 5.28
= 6.28
= 7
Length of interval
class (P) =![]()
= ![]()
=
4.16
=
4
Then the result above put into tables of
distributions frequency as follows :
Table 8
The invariant
frequency of Writing Ability
|
Score |
Ƒ |
|
|
ƒ |
ƒ |
|
58 – 61 |
5 |
59.5 |
3540.25 |
297.5 |
17701.25 |
|
62 – 65 |
5 |
63.5 |
4032.25 |
317.5 |
20161.25 |
|
66 – 69 |
5 |
67.5 |
4556.25 |
337.5 |
22781.25 |
|
70 – 73 |
9 |
71.5 |
5112.25 |
643.5 |
46010.25 |
|
74 – 77 |
6 |
75.5 |
6700.25 |
453 |
40201.5 |
|
78 – 81 |
4 |
79.5 |
6320.25 |
318 |
25281 |
|
82 – 85 |
6 |
83.5 |
6972.5 |
501 |
41835 |
|
Total |
40 |
2868 |
213971.5 |
Source :
The Data Analysis
From the table above it is obtained that
:
∑ ƒ
= 2868
∑ ƒ
2
= 213971.5
∑ ƒ
= 40
From the result above, so it would be
looked for average (
) and standard deviation (S) as follows :
= ![]()
=
= 71.7
S2 = ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S2
= ![]()
S = 14.62
The
next step is determining the expected frequency (Ei) and observed frequency
(Oi), as follows :
1.
Delimitating the boundary of the class (X) by using subtracting the lowest
score in the class by 0.5
2.
Calculating Z for the boundary of the class with the formula Z =
.
3.
Calculating the with of the interval class by seeing Z value list.
4.
Calculating expected frequency (Ei) by multiplying the wide of every interval
with the total of every interval with the total of the data that is : Ei =
Li . n.
Table 9
List of The Distribution
of Expected and Observed
Frequency of Writing Ability Test
|
X |
Z |
Zi |
Li |
Ei |
Oi |
|
57.5 61.5 65.5 69.5 73.5 77.5 81.5 85.5 |
-0.97 -0.70 -0.42 -0.15 0.12 0.40 0.67 0.94 |
0.3340 0.2580 0.1628 0.0596 0.0478 0.1554 0.2486 0.3264 |
0.076 0.0952 0.1032 0.1074 0.1076 0.0932 0.0778 |
3.04 3.80 4.13 4.30 4.30 3.73 3.11 |
5 5 5 9 6 4 6 |
Source
: The Data Analysis
2ratio = ![]()
2ratio = ![]()
2ratio = 1.26 + 0.38
+ 0.18 + 5.13 + 0.67 + 0.02 + 2.68
2ratio =
10.32
Test criterion :
Accept
Ho if
count <
2
(1 – α)(k – 1)
For
significant level of 1% (α = 0.01) got :
table =
2 (1-0.01)(6-3)
=
2 (0.99)(3)
=
11.3
From
calculation above, it was found at significance level of 0.01 that :
count <
table. So, the H0 hypothesis
is accepted, it means that the data have normal distribution.
4.4 The
Data Analysis
4.4.1 The Analysis Invariance Frequency
Distribution of Students’ Ability in Building Sentences and Writing Ability
To find invariance frequency Distribution of students’
ability in getting main idea, the writer used the following formula:
![]()
Notes:
I = interval
class
NT = the
highest score
NR = the
lowest score
K = categories
From the
table 3 above, it can be seen that:
The Highest
Score is 84
The Lowest
Score is 44
While the criterion was divided into three forms,
namely high, middle and low. So the interval was:
![]()
![]()
= 13.3
= 13
Table 10
The Invariance Frequency
Distribution of Students’ Ability in
Building Sentences
|
No |
Interval |
Categories |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
|
1 |
44 – 56 |
Low |
7 |
17.5% |
|
2 |
57
– 69 |
Middle |
16 |
40% |
|
3 |
70 – 84 |
High |
17 |
42.5% |
|
TOTAL |
40 |
100% |
||
Source: Data
Analysis
From the
table above, the writer made classification as follows:
A. There were 7
students or 17.5%students
got low score
B. There were 16 students or 40% students got middle score
C. There were 17 students or 42.5% students got high score
4.4.2 The
Analysis Invarience Frequency Distribution of Students’ Writing Ability
To find the
analysis invariance frequency distribution of students’ writing ability,the
writer used the following formula:
![]()
Notes:
I = interval class
NT = the highest
score
NR =
the lowest score
K = categories
From the table 6 above, it can be seen that:
The Highest Score is 83
The Lowest Score is 58
While the criterion was divided into three forms,
namely high, middle and low. So the interval was:
![]()
![]()
=8.3
= 8
Table 11
The Invariance Frequency
Distribution of Students’ Writing Ability
|
No |
Interval |
Categories |
Frequencies |
Percentage |
|
1 |
58
– 65 |
Low |
10 |
25% |
|
2 |
66
– 73 |
Middle |
14 |
35% |
|
3 |
74
– 83 |
High |
16 |
40% |
|
TOTAL |
40 |
100% |
||
Source: Data
Analysis
From the table above, the writer made classification
as follows:
A. There were
10 students or 25% students got low score
B. There were
14 students or 35% students
got middle score
C. There were
16 students or 40% students got high score
4.5 The Hypothesis
Test
4.5.1 The
First Hypothesis
Based on the data that is got by the
writer ( in the table above ) the writer can make the hypothesis, as follows :
Table 12
The Data
Calculation of The Correlation between Students’ Ability in Building Sentences
(X) and Their Writing Ability (Y)
|
No |
X |
Y |
X2 |
Y2 |
XY |
|
1 |
58 |
60 |
3364 |
3600 |
3480 |
|
2 |
84 |
82 |
7056 |
6724 |
6888 |
|
3 |
74 |
80 |
5476 |
6400 |
5920 |
|
4 |
68 |
73 |
4624 |
5329 |
4964 |
|
5 |
80 |
82 |
6400 |
6724 |
6560 |
|
6 |
52 |
66 |
2704 |
4356 |
3432 |
|
7 |
62 |
68 |
3844 |
4624 |
4216 |
|
8 |
67 |
68 |
4489 |
4624 |
4556 |
|
9 |
82 |
83 |
6724 |
6889 |
6806 |
|
10 |
78 |
78 |
6084 |
6084 |
6084 |
|
11 |
54 |
66 |
2916 |
4356 |
3564 |
|
12 |
84 |
74 |
7056 |
5476 |
6216 |
|
13 |
64 |
64 |
4096 |
4096 |
4096 |
|
14 |
54 |
67 |
2916 |
4489 |
3618 |
|
15 |
60 |
60 |
3600 |
3600 |
3600 |
|
16 |
60 |
64 |
3600 |
4096 |
3840 |
|
17 |
80 |
82 |
6400 |
6724 |
6560 |
|
18 |
66 |
60 |
4356 |
3600 |
3960 |
|
19 |
72 |
70 |
5184 |
4900 |
5040 |
|
20 |
69 |
76 |
4761 |
5776 |
5244 |
|
21 |
84 |
83 |
7056 |
6889 |
6972 |
|
22 |
70 |
70 |
4900 |
4900 |
4900 |
|
23 |
76 |
59 |
5776 |
3481 |
4484 |
|
24 |
82 |
78 |
6724 |
6084 |
6396 |
|
25 |
82 |
82 |
6724 |
6724 |
6724 |
|
26 |
65 |
75 |
4225 |
5625 |
4875 |
|
27 |
56 |
74 |
3136 |
5476 |
4144 |
|
28 |
84 |
78 |
7056 |
6084 |
6552 |
|
29 |
58 |
77 |
3364 |
5929 |
4466 |
|
30 |
44 |
64 |
1936 |
4096 |
2816 |
|
31 |
50 |
62 |
2500 |
3844 |
3100 |
|
32 |
66 |
70 |
4356 |
4900 |
4620 |
|
33 |
60 |
64 |
3600 |
4096 |
3840 |
|
34 |
82 |
76 |
6724 |
5776 |
6232 |
|
35 |
62 |
72 |
3844 |
5184 |
4464 |
|
36 |
78 |
72 |
6084 |
5184 |
5616 |
|
37 |
56 |
70 |
3136 |
4900 |
3920 |
|
38 |
62 |
58 |
3844 |
3364 |
3596 |
|
39 |
70 |
70 |
4900 |
4900 |
4900 |
|
40 |
68 |
72 |
4624 |
5184 |
4896 |
|
TOTAL |
2723 |
2849 |
190159 |
205087 |
196157 |
Source: The Data Analysis
To find out and to prove whether there
is correlation between students’ ability in
building sentences and their writing ability, the
writer used product moment formula, as follow :
=![]()
=![]()
=![]()
=![]()
=![]()
=
![]()
= 0.69
There is correlation between students’
ability in building sentences and their writing ability. It is indicated that rxy
where from the calculation is got rxy
= 0.69
. It showed that there is
correlation between students’ ability in building sentences and their writing
ability.
The second hypothesis is there is
positive correlation between students’ ability in building sentences and their
writing ability. In testing the second hypothesis, the writer used the criteria
as follow: If rcount >
0.00 it means that there was positive correlation and if rcount <
0.00 it means that there was negative correlation (there was no correlation).
Based on the calculation above, it was
gained rcount = 0.69
> 0. The second hypothesis was accepted. It means that there was positive
correlation between students ability in building sentences and their writing
ability.
The third hypothesis is there is significant
correlation between students’ ability in building sentences and their writing
ability. Tp prove the third hypothesis, the writer used criteria as follow: If
rcount was higher than rtable with n=40 at significance
level 0.01 there was significant correlation. And if rcount was
lower than rtable with n=40 at significance level 0.01 there was no
significant correlation. Based on the calculation above, that rcount
= 0.69 higher than rtable
= 0.32. It means that there was signifivant correlation between students’
ability in building sentences and their writing ability.
4.6 Discussion
Based on the data analysis, the writer
found that there are many problems faced by the students in writing, espacially
in building sentences. It also can proved by the score of the students in
writing. Building sentences is one of the process to practice writing. Building
sentences is an activity or a process to combined the words become a sentence.
Writing is made up of sentences. It constitutes to be the combination of simple
sentence, compound sentence, complex sentence. So, building sentences can help
the students to write well.
According to Harmer (2004:33) Writing is
frequently useful as preparation for some other acyivity, in particular when
students write sentences as a preamble to discussion activities. So the
students can go through what they know in their minds and the students can use
dictionaries, grammar book or other refrences material to help them. So they
can develop their writing, not only can write a sentence but also write
paragraph.
Based on the data analysis and
hypothesis test, the result of the research showed rcount = 0.69 is higher than rtable
= 0.32. It means that there was correlation between students’ ability in
building sentences and their writing ability. By the criterion if rcount was
higher than rtable at
significant level 0.01 there was significant correlation.
After
the writer did the research and got the data, the writer can measure degree of
each students knowledge and also this test is good for them. They can practice
in writing and some of them can do the exercise from the writer and gets the good point. Based on the score
of the students, the writer gives
some solution to increase the students’ building sentences ability and their
writing ability as follow:
1. The students must motivate
themselves to interested in learning English especially in writing.
2. The students can serch the
references to help them in writing, students can use dictionary, grammar book,
or internet.
3. The students should learn and be
active in learning English espesially in writing, so their ability in writing
will be better.
CHAPTER
V
CONCLUSION
AND SUGGESTION
5.1 Conclusion
Based on the result of the data analysis
and hypothesis, the writer concluded that :
1. There
was correlation between students ability in building sentences and their
writing ability at the tenth
class of Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar
Lampung in 2015/2016.
2. In
teaching writing especially in building sentences, the students should master
the structure to increase the students’ writing ability.
5.2 Suggestion
Based on the conclusion above, the
writer would like to suggest that may helpful to increase the quality of the
student at the tenth
class of Madrasah Aliyah Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung as
follows:
1.
In teaching English, the
teacher has to give more attention to the students. The teacher should motivate
the students to be serious in learning English. Teacher should give the
students a good ability in learning writing especially in writing sentences.
Teacher should increase the students’ English achievement, and give the
students a lot of writing exercises to support their ability in learning
English.
2. The
students should motivate themselves to increase their ability in English
especially in writing. The students should learn and be active in writing by
using appropriate words to be sentences in order to increase their writing, so
their ability in writing will be better.
3. The
school should provide a library that consists
of quality books and should provide laboratory. It means to make the students
interest to improve their skill and add their knowledge especially about
English.

Posting Komentar untuk "SKRIPSI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS : THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN BUILDING SENTENCES AND THEIR WRITING ABILITY AT THE TENTH CLASS "